10 Comments

User's avatar
MTC's avatar

To some degree or another all of that is true and yet I cannot predict whether the near future will be bleaker, hard to imagine, or marginally better. From where I sit much of the dysfunction seems sociological. Yes, prices are higher and there is less stuff but not so much so that we should be seeing something akin to collapse. And yet, collapsing we are.

I'll skip the litany of woes that plague my neck of the woods but basically all of the systems bar a few are failing and in decline. Virtually no civil or criminal enforcement exists where I live. So OD deaths, open drug sales, illegal toxic dumps, people with w/o sanitation services, rats, filth, burning dumpsters to clear them of piled up waste... All becoming the norm. This isn't a linear progression, there have been a few good months here and there and some official interventions to keep people safe and clean, etc. but overall real Hollywood style collapse doesn't seem that far off from where I stand.

Whether this is based on a decline in living standards and consumption, I don't know. Seems like even under the current scenario some progress and improvements would be possible if we had the will to do something, anything. But from state officials to local residents everyone seems to be giving up or withdrawing into their own partially fantasy fueled alt. reality. Escapism or denial remains possible because some places and institutions continue to work rather well. On a bad day, my neighborhood could be mistaken for the set of a Mel Gibson era Road Warrior movie but a few miles away I work in relative comfort in a secure office with reliable heat and sanitation, etc... Which version is real?

In Maine there appears to actually be a constituency for something I don’t even have a word for, something like anti-development. For example, locals sometimes sabotage road repairs to keep people out. On a larger and more abstract level people vote, albeit in minorities, for clearly failed polices that even the most ignorant cannot believe would lead to material progress. There is, at least in Maine, a constituency for actually reversing material progress. I don’t think I am stretching the truth here at all. I hear people complain that the "legit" businesses are limiting their ability to engage in what I think of as "extra or ill-legal occupations" like drug sales, chop shops and stolen goods all of which occur pretty much openly anyway. No one seems bothered by this at all.

I haven't a clue how this will work out locally or internationally but it does seem different this time. I also think we all undervalue the basic services collective society offers. You cannot sell stolen chainsaws on FB without a lot of hidden supports and labor for example. Even the very lowest rungs of our social ladder are dependent on vast bureaucracies and intricate technologies that they do not understand and take for granted. I guess we will probably muddle through with some places more livable than others but I hope we all understand the important role that each worker, each computer server, sanitation code enforcer, farmer, fire dept, etc... does. I see these things slipping away without replacement and begin to fret.

Expand full comment
The Whopper's avatar

This is some trash analysis.

Any discussion of inflation that doesn't include monetary supply is missing the largest factor by far. Trillions of dollars printed by central banks to prop up inefficient and dying institutions had to go somewhere. It was mostly exported, inflating everyone else's currencies, and was spent on real estate and bonds, until the pandemic, when uncertainty upended the bond market and vast government stimulus pushed enough dollars into the M2 system that it caused an uptick in inflation, which was seized upon by corporations raising prices to "compensate" for disrupted supply chains. When inflation rose above the yield on most corporate and Treasury bonds, which was only a few percent, the bond market became functionally illiquid, forcing banks to use the reverse repo facility at the Fed (currently over 2 trillion dollars parked with them overnight in return for a few percent interest because they couldn't get better returns elsewhere), and to raise prices further to offset their losses on debt. Cue inflationary spiral. The central banks tried raising rates to reduce lending and the supply of money, "hopefully" causing a rise in unemployment and a slowing down of the economy, but this only increased the supply of money being pumped into the system with nothing good to buy with it.

The climate crisis has been making things worse, especially for the insane last-minute supply chains that we built in the last 30 years, and they add to inflation in a serious way that should be addressed, but holy fuck it is nothing compared to the debt trap the Fed has been plunging into for decades. The Triffin Dilemma is coming home to roost: force everyone to use your currency abroad by printing dollars and spending them abroad, and inflate global currencies against your own,

keeping your own prices low and giving you leverage over the world, untill the amount of dollar denominated debt causes massive demand in a period of economic shock that requires either you stop printing dollars (increasing demand and inflation) or you print more to inflate your way out of it (causing hyperinflation).

Shock is the key here. The rich will use this economic shock to scoop up yet more of the world's assets; our land and water and infrastructure, and they'll rent it all back to us, keeping us in our place. It's a predictable cycle and it's what the central banks have orchestrated for as long as they have existed.

"The indigenous peoples knew nothing of the complex global geopolitics that had led to their home temporarily becoming a forward operations base for the world's major industrial powers."

The irony is palpable.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts